Back to Blog
Donkey development xmlspear7/6/2023 ![]() The source view is great for correcting unwellformed xml, doing finds-replaces or copy-and-paste. The element view is especially usefull if your element has many attributes. This view makes XMLSpear different form many other XML tools. It is the most convenient view for correcting and editing xml. You can insert and delete nodes, and even build a whole document from scratch. Edit your xml files tag-free in this view and don't worry about typing reserved xml characters because it is all handled for you. The treetable is great to see the structure of the xml file. ![]() The XML is displayed in three different views: ![]() ![]() XMLSpear is great for users that just want to edit or check XML files without deep knowledge of the XML syntax. It is easy to use, built in Java and available for all platforms. This should then be able to run from a client, but it still isn't applicable for use with OnDemand environments (sorry) or some on-premise ones because this doesn't work with https/ssl connections.XMLSpear is a free XML editor with a great real-time validation feature. You can adjust/tune the memory parameters as preferred. Start /MIN java -cp %MYCP% -Xms512m -Xmx1024m .XogGui ?% ?% bat file in the place you installed the XOG client to and populating it with the offįor %%i in (lib\*.jar) do set MYCP=!MYCP! %%i To assist with that, I would suggest creating a. However, the invocation as it is given isn't suitable (namely, the classpath is insufficient and you'll hit lots of 'class not found' errors, and the memory settings aren't supplied for it to use). That said, it can be used and not only on servers. If it is successful that is fine, but if it fails, the same problem would have to occur with the supported xog client in order for it to be a viable fault. Using it isn't an issue, but it isn't a maintained part of the product or provided for customer use, it would be like using a bespoke written XOG client. I don't mean to be the bearer of bad news, but please be aware that this isn't a supported client. I should consider that to be more the reason for the problems. If you serach through these message boards you can see the there are many users who complain (and many who just live with it) the large amounts data overhead XOG creats in he output files which many times are used as input files. For the the solution was to limit the data not to eliminate.Ī better way to deal with this would have been a better graphical GUI with restrictions for the amount of data if needed. Basically that is not ane different result than the users making large Exports to Excel. I understand the Clarity system admins may feel it is better if users not aware of the limitations conistently cause OOM errors. Is there any data available about what kind of user acceptance this change received? Those who cannot will be dissatisfied with the product over all. If that is the only option it will continue the thrend: those who have the technical skills will developt their own Graphical interface and commercialize it like some of the partners and CA services have already done. The UI for should be more user friendly and less technical (even less technical than the console based XOG client.Ī development tool is not the solution. ![]() Now removing the unlisted page is the answer. Clarity and the UI is being developed towards mobile devices, apparently because the users prefer to use them.įor years users have been asking for better UI for XOGing. There simply is not anything firiendly in the console based XOG client.Ĭome on now. "In truth, it's quite friendly! " do disagree with that. If a pseudo-graphical UI is preferred for performing XOG actions over the console based XOG client, I would recommend using one like SoapUI (there's a personal edition that is free to use). There have been a number of changes to XOG behaviour in 13.3 all intended to improve the overall user experience, of which this was one. In some cases even an XML file that is under 20MB in physical size could cause a thread in the app servlet to exceed 1GB to process. This would result in many instances of Clarity server outages that would make the system unavailable in the best case, and in worse cases result in lost work/data. There is a large burden placed upon these servlets for XOG traffic (by orders of magnitude in memory compared to the 'xog' servlet) because it was never meant for end-user use. The 'app' and 'nu' servlets were not intended to be used for XOG traffic and the page existed only as a developer shortcut. In truth, it's quite friendly! The Clarity is made up of different 'servlets' within the application service. ![]()
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |